Loading ...

Informing Assessment Methods Section | Learning Outcomes at Seneca | Seneca College

Home » Spaces » Learning Outcomes at Seneca » Articles » Informing Assessment Methods Section
Learning Outcomes at Seneca

Leave Space :

Are you sure you want to leave this space?

Join this space:

Join this space?

Edit navigation item

Required The name that will appear in the space navigation.
Required The url can point to an internal or external web page.
Login to follow, share, and participate in this space.
Not a member?Join now
Informing Assessment Methods Section

Informing Assessment Methods Section

0 (0votes)

McMahon and Thakore (2006) define constructive alignment as achieving coherence between assessment methods, teaching strategies and learning outcomes in your course. Starting with well-written learning outcomes will allow you to discern which assessment methods are most appropriate to use. Designing effective assessment methods will then guide your teaching strategies, which should be closely linked to your initial learning outcomes. There is some debate about the sequence of these events, and you are encouraged to think about all three events as continuously informing each other, to ensure that students receive the best overall learning experience.

Constructive alignment is achieving coherence between Learning Outcomes, Assessment methods, and Teaching Strategies, we can think of these three areas as the three points in a triangle.

More information can be found in in the Student Assessment Policy at Seneca.

Formative Assessment

Engaging students in formative assessment activities is a good way to judge how well they are enacting your intending learning outcomes, and receive some feedback. It is important to make sure the formative assessment also acts as an opportunity for students to self-reflect on their progress, and therefore there must be a clear connection between course outcomes and assessment activities, and these should be communicated to students.

Comments (no comments yet)